---
title: "The 7 best white label telehealth platforms in 2026"
description: "The 7 best white label telehealth platforms in 2026, ranked on published pricing, patient ownership, labs and launch time. Cuvo Health ranks first."
canonical: "https://cuvo.co/blog/best-white-label-telehealth-platforms"
last-updated: "Oct 13, 2026"
keywords: ["best white label telehealth platforms", "white label telehealth platform", "telehealth platforms", "white label telehealth", "white label telehealth companies", "telehealth platform for brands", "white label telemedicine platform", "white label telehealth software"]
---
# The 7 best white label telehealth platforms in 2026

By Priya Raman, Director of Partner Growth. Published Jul 6, 2026. Updated Oct 13, 2026. Growth.

Sixteen platforms sell some version of launch your own branded telehealth clinic. They differ on three checkable points: who owns the patient and the revenue, what they publish about price, and how much of the clinic they actually run. Scored on those points from public sources, seven make a 2026 shortlist, and Cuvo Health ranks first as the only one that operates the clinic, the pharmacy network, the billing and the compliance in one stack while publishing its per-consult rate, its platform fees and its no-revenue-share terms.

**Ranking**
1. Cuvo Health: Best overall for founder-led, multi-vertical brands: an operated clinic with published $25 consults and no revenue share
2. OpenLoop: Best for enterprises that accept revenue share and billing through the vendor
3. Wheel: Best for health plans and enterprise programs quoted deal by deal
4. Beluga Health: Best for DTC brands that prioritize physician-founded clinical pedigree
5. Telegra: Best for brands that want tiered monthly plans on a storefront-first stack
6. CareValidate: Best for multi-vertical DTC brands that want LegitScript ad support and accept per-order fees
7. Fuse Health: Best for peptide-first brands

The best white label telehealth platform in 2026 is Cuvo Health. Of the seven platforms compared here, it is the only one that runs the licensed clinic, the pharmacy, the billing and the compliance as one operated stack and publishes its platform pricing in full: a flat $25 per completed consult, a flat monthly platform fee and no revenue share. OpenLoop, Wheel, Beluga Health, Telegra, CareValidate and Fuse Health are the alternatives. They diverge on three things a founder can check before a sales call: whether the price is published and binding, whose merchant account the patient pays into, and how much of the daily clinical and back-office work stays with the brand.

Updated September 30, 2026. Every platform on this page was checked against its public website on September 22, 2026, and OpenLoop, Wheel, Beluga Health, Telegra, CareValidate and Fuse Health were checked again on September 30, 2026. Where a company does not publish a figure, the tables say not published rather than guessing.

**Key takeaways**
- Best overall: Cuvo Health: an operated clinic behind the brand with providers in all 50 states, licensed partner pharmacies, billing and compliance in one stack
- Platforms compared: 7 ranked, 10 more evaluated and set aside, all from public sources
- Published pricing: Cuvo ($25 a consult, $997 or $2,500 a month), Telegra and Fuse Health publish rates, and CareValidate publishes only a 3.7% card processing rate. OpenLoop, Wheel and Beluga quote by call
- Who keeps the money: On Cuvo, revenue settles to the brand's own merchant account with no revenue share. OpenLoop bills the patient and remits a share weekly
- Not the right fit: Cuvo is cash-pay by design: an insurer or health plan that needs payer billing, or a clinic that only needs Good Faith Exams, is buying a different product
- Facts checked: September 22, 2026, against each company's public materials; six of the seven re-checked September 30, 2026

## What should you look for in a white-label telehealth platform?

Look for published economics, patient and revenue ownership, and who runs the clinic day to day. Feature lists in this market are close to identical, so the ranking turns on commercial and structural questions a founder can verify without a sales call. Six criteria, applied to all sixteen platforms:

1. Published economics: is there a rate on the website, and does it cover the per-consult fee and revenue share as well as the platform fee?
2. Ownership: whose merchant account do patients pay into, and who holds the records, the card tokens and the patient list at exit?
3. Depth of the stack: does the vendor run clinical and back-office operations, or hand the operator a dashboard to staff?
4. Network and legal structure: who employs the clinicians, in how many states, and does the vendor build the MSO structure a non-clinician owner needs?
5. Verticals: can one brand sell weight loss, hormone therapy, peptides, sexual health and women's health side by side, or is the menu bounded?
6. Compliance and advertising: HIPAA posture, LegitScript certification and the security evidence procurement asks for.

**The seven best white label telehealth platforms in 2026, ranked**

| Platform | Best for | Verticals | Pricing model (as of September 22, 2026) | Compliance and structure |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **1. Cuvo Health** | Founder-led, multi-vertical brands | GLP-1 weight loss, peptides, testosterone and hormone therapy, sexual health, women's health, wellness, hair loss | $25 per completed consult, no revenue share. Launch $997 a month after $9,800 setup, Grow $2,500 after $15,000, Enterprise custom, month to month | MSO plus physician-owned professional entity built and maintained by Cuvo, LegitScript managed, HIPAA with a BAA, SOC 2 Type II on every plan |
| 2. OpenLoop | Enterprises that accept revenue share | Weight loss, testosterone therapy, sexual health, plus supplements | Not published. Per a May 2026 OpenLoop proposal: $9,000 setup, $1,500 a month from the first patient, 12-month term, and 42 to 59 percent of patient revenue retained | Coverage across all 50 states and DC, with prescribing and pharmacy supplied by OpenLoop only. HHS-confirmed January 2026 breach affecting up to 716,000 patients |
| 3. Wheel | Health plans and enterprise programs | Weight management, GLP-1 and non-GLP-1 clinical programs | Not published. Enterprise quotes deal by deal, with no per-consult rate, subscription price or revenue-share terms on the site | Clinical governance through Wheel Medical Group. HIPAA, SOC 2 and HITRUST aligned, per its site |
| 4. Beluga Health | DTC brands buying clinical pedigree | Weight management, men's health, women's health, dermatology-style async consults | Not published. Custom quotes through Beluga sales, with Beluga's medication markup and any revenue share not publicly stated | Physician-founded, LegitScript certified and HIPAA-compliant, per its site. MSO structure not publicly detailed |
| 5. Telegra | Tiered monthly plans, storefront-first | Weight loss plus standard prescription verticals on one multi-condition storefront | Plus $2,999 a month or Pro $5,999, plus a one-time $5,000 or $10,000 onboarding fee, per its site as of September 30, 2026. Telegra's medication markup not published | HIPAA-compliant stack. LegitScript and MSO details not publicly detailed |
| 6. CareValidate | Multi-vertical DTC that accepts per-order fees | Weight management, men's health, women's health, dermatology | Platform fees not published on its site. Per pricing materials Cuvo reviewed: Pro $2,500 a month, Enterprise $5,000, plus a $5,000 to $7,500 storefront build, $2,500 migration, $3 to $5 per order past 250, and LegitScript at $205 a month. Medication prices not published | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA posture, 503A and 503B pharmacy relationships, LegitScript customer spotlight. Contract term and data export not published |
| 7. Fuse Health | Peptide-first brands | Peptides first, with GLP-1 weight loss and hormones among 70 visit types in 11 categories | Growth $699 or Partner $3,000 a month, plus a 2 percent merchant service fee on every sale and a one-time onboarding fee it does not publish (as of September 30, 2026) | HIPAA-compliant EMR with state-specific routing, LegitScript listed as a partner. MSO structure not publicly stated |

> **Our recommendation** Cuvo Health is the first choice for a founder without a medical license, for consumer brands running GLP-1, hormone therapy, peptide, sexual health or women's health programs side by side, and for multi-brand operators through the custom-scoped Enterprise tier. It is the only platform of the seven that arrives with the providers, the licensed partner pharmacies, the labs, the subscription billing, the MSO and physician-owned professional entity, and the LegitScript work already running behind the brand, at published rates a founder can model before a call. The six alternatives each leave at least one of those pieces, the billing rails, the pharmacy economics, the entity structure or the daily operations, with the operator or a second vendor. Where a competitor is genuinely the better fit, which is Fuse Health for a peptide-first brand and Wheel for a health plan, this guide says so.

> **See the whole clinic, and the whole price** Cuvo publishes every fee on the pricing page, then runs the providers, pharmacy network, billing and compliance behind your brand, typically live in under 30 days. [Book a discovery call](/booking) · [See pricing](/pricing)

**What each platform publishes about price, ownership and launch, as of September 22, 2026**

| Platform | Published pricing | Who owns the patient and revenue | Time to launch |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Cuvo Health** | $25 per completed consult, no revenue share. Launch $997 a month ($9,800 setup), Grow $2,500 ($15,000 setup), Enterprise custom | The brand: patients, records and revenue, settled to its own merchant account, exportable at any time | Typically under 30 days |
| OpenLoop | Not published. A May 2026 OpenLoop proposal quoted $9,000 setup and $1,500 a month on a 12-month term | OpenLoop: the patient card is charged into OpenLoop's merchant account and a share is remitted weekly | Not published. The 12-month term starts at signature |
| Wheel | Not published. Enterprise quotes only | Not stated publicly | Under 90 days, per its TPA offering |
| Beluga Health | Not published. Custom quotes through sales | Not stated publicly; the operator keeps marketing and acquisition | Not published. Scoped per deal |
| Telegra | $2,999 or $5,999 a month plus a $5,000 or $10,000 onboarding fee, as of September 30, 2026. No provider-visit fee listed | Funds settle to the brand's own payment processor on a fixed fee, per its site | About 21 days, per its site |
| CareValidate | Platform fees not published on its site. Per pricing materials Cuvo reviewed: Pro $2,500 a month, Enterprise $5,000, plus implementation, migration and per-order fees. Medication prices not published | Payments run through CareValidate's own processing at a published 3.7 percent; per pricing materials Cuvo reviewed, a brand's own account is gated to Enterprise | About 30 days, with published exclusions |
| Fuse Health | $699 or $3,000 a month, plus 2 percent of every sale and an onboarding fee it does not publish, as of September 30, 2026 | The operator sets retail and owns acquisition; Fuse takes a percentage of each sale | Hours to under 7 days, per its marketing |

## 01. Cuvo Health: best overall white label platform

Cuvo runs the entire licensed clinic behind a consumer brand. More than 300 board-certified MDs, NPs and PAs licensed across all 50 states, DC, Puerto Rico, Guam and the US territories are recruited, credentialed and managed by Cuvo, available 24 hours a day, with a first provider review as fast as 15 minutes and monthly license, sanction and exclusion screening. They practice through a physician-owned professional entity inside an MSO structure Cuvo builds and maintains, which is what lets a founder without a medical license own the brand. E-prescribing and EPCS, Labcorp and Quest lab ordering, licensed partner pharmacies with cold-chain home delivery, subscription billing with dunning, retention automation, analytics and managed LegitScript certification run in the same stack.

The economics are the reason Cuvo ranks first rather than the feature list. Cuvo publishes the numbers that decide its cost to a brand: a flat $25 per completed consult and no revenue share of any kind. Launch is $997 a month after a one-time $9,800 setup, Grow is $2,500 a month after $15,000, and Enterprise is scoped to the build, all month to month. Patients pay into the brand's own merchant account, and the patients, records and order history stay the brand's asset, exportable at any time. Of the six alternatives, three publish no rate at all.

Breadth matters as much as price for a brand that intends to grow past one product. Cuvo operates GLP-1 weight loss with semaglutide and tirzepatide, peptides, testosterone and hormone therapy, sexual health, women's health including HRT and menopause, wellness, and hair loss, all available on every plan with no vertical gating and no per-category fee. Launches typically take under 30 days because the clinic, the pharmacy network and the compliance structure already run as one productized stack. The operator brings the brand, the marketing and the audience. Cuvo runs everything regulated behind it, and clinical decisions stay with the licensed providers.

## 02. OpenLoop: best for enterprises on revenue share

OpenLoop supplies the same category of white label infrastructure as Cuvo: clinicians, an EHR, e-prescribing, pharmacy fulfillment and compliance, with coverage across all 50 states and DC and optional care coaching layered on top. It is a serious platform, and for an enterprise that would rather hand the billing relationship to a vendor than run it, that consolidation is the product rather than the catch.

The commercial model is what separates it from Cuvo. As of September 22, 2026, OpenLoop publishes no rate card. A May 2026 OpenLoop proposal reviewed for Cuvo's comparison page quoted a $9,000 implementation fee, $1,500 a month from the first patient seen and a 12-month initial term, with LegitScript certification through OpenLoop as a $3,000 add-on. Patients pay into OpenLoop's merchant account, OpenLoop holds the card tokens and remits a membership services fee every Wednesday, and on maintenance patients that remittance schedule leaves OpenLoop retaining 42 to 59 percent of what the patient pays, a share that rises the longer a patient stays.

Two further facts belong in a shortlist decision. OpenLoop disclosed a January 7, 2026 breach affecting up to 716,000 individuals, confirmed on the HHS Office for Civil Rights portal, and the affected population was its clients' patients under its clients' brand names. And the 50-state headline carries carve-outs: testosterone therapy with scheduled medications is listed in roughly 35 states, subject to change. OpenLoop is the right answer for an enterprise that accepts revenue share and billing through the vendor. A founder modeling contribution margin should read the full line-by-line comparison first.

## 03. Wheel: best for health plans and enterprise programs

Wheel is the enterprise incumbent of the category. Founded in 2018 in Austin and backed by more than $216 million, its Wheel Horizon platform pairs a 50-state clinician network governed by Wheel Medical Group with care enablement software and 70 or more clinical programs, and its site reports more than 7 million patient visits with medication fulfilled through an Amazon Pharmacy integration. Its compliance posture is described as HIPAA, SOC 2 and HITRUST aligned, which is the evidence package a health plan's vendor risk review asks for.

Wheel sells to health plans, pharma, retailers and third-party administrators, and it prices accordingly. As of September 22, 2026 Wheel has no public rate card, no published per-consult fee, no subscription price and no stated revenue-share or medication-markup terms, and its own TPA offering targets go-live in under 90 days. For a founder, that combination means unit economics stay unknowable until deep inside a sales cycle, and a quarter of procurement is the entry toll. Cuvo Enterprise covers the same multi-brand ground while keeping the published $25 consult and no-revenue-share terms, which is why Wheel places third here rather than second.

Two questions decide whether Wheel is the right seat for a given program. The first is who the patient belongs to, which Wheel does not state publicly, and which matters more for a consumer brand building an asset than for a health plan running a covered benefit. The second is medication economics: fulfillment runs through an Amazon Pharmacy integration, and Wheel discloses no markup or fulfillment spread, so the largest recurring line in a cash-pay P&L is set inside a contract rather than on a page. Wheel is the right answer when the buyer is an enterprise with a procurement function and a program to configure rather than a brand to launch.

## 04. Beluga Health: best for physician-founded pedigree

Beluga Health is a physician-founded telehealth company serving direct-to-consumer prescription brands, and clinical credibility is what it sells. Licensed providers across all 50 states, an async medical intake and review workflow tuned for high-volume consumer flows, pharmacy fulfillment and a LegitScript-certified posture that unlocks Google and Meta advertising. For a risk-sensitive DTC brand that wants a medical team rather than pure software behind its name, the pedigree story travels well with partners and ad platforms.

The gap is transparency and scope. As of September 22, 2026, Beluga publishes no rate card, no per-consult fee and no platform fee, quotes deals individually through sales, and states neither a medication markup nor any revenue share; its MSO structure is not publicly detailed and it publishes no launch timeline. Its verticals cover weight management, men's health, women's health and dermatology-style consults, a narrower menu than Cuvo's seven categories. Choose Beluga when physician-founded pedigree is the deciding purchase criterion and a custom quote is acceptable. Choose Cuvo when the same clinical depth has to come with published economics and the brand's own merchant account.

The async engine is the part worth studying regardless of who wins the deal. Store-and-forward intake and provider review is what makes a consumer telehealth funnel convert at volume, because the patient completes a questionnaire in minutes instead of holding a video appointment, and Beluga has tuned that flow for high-volume DTC rather than enterprise clinical programs. Cuvo runs the same async model with live video available, providers reviewing as fast as 15 minutes and availability 24 hours a day, and adds the pieces that come after the prescription: subscription billing with dunning, retention automation and cohort analytics. Ask both vendors for the async approval rate, the review turnaround and who carries the clinical escalation pathway.

## 05. Telegra: best for tiered monthly storefront plans

Telegra earns its place almost entirely on budgetability. It sells white label telehealth on tiered monthly plans, with licensed providers across all 50 states, intake, e-prescribing and pharmacy routing running under the brand's name on a storefront-first stack. Its plans are Plus at $2,999 a month and Pro at $5,999, plus a one-time onboarding fee of $5,000 or $10,000, per its site as of September 30, 2026. A founder can put a line in a model before booking a call, which most of this category refuses to allow.

Cuvo also publishes its pricing, at a lower and flatter structure: $997 or $2,500 a month against Telegra's $2,999 or $5,999, with a flat $25 per completed consult where Telegra's pricing page lists no provider-visit fee. The gap sits in the monthly base: each Telegra plan costs about three times the matching Cuvo plan, every month, before the first patient. Scope differs too: Telegra's public offering centers on the visit and prescription layer, while billing with dunning, retention automation, analytics and the MSO structure are inside the Cuvo platform. Telegra suits a brand that wants a knowable monthly line item on a storefront-first stack.

Three items are worth confirming in writing before a Telegra contract, because the published plans do not cover them. Its pricing page lists no provider-visit fee as of September 30, 2026, so ask what each consult costs before modeling volume. Telegra's medication markup is not publicly stated, which means the monthly plan is not the whole variable cost. And ask which conditions each plan covers, so a brand that later adds hormone therapy or peptides beside weight loss knows whether the second one needs the $5,999 Pro plan before signing the first. On Cuvo every category is on every plan at the same flat rate, so expansion does not reopen the commercial conversation.

## 06. CareValidate: best for LegitScript ad support

CareValidate is a real platform with real credentials. SOC 2 Type II, a HIPAA posture, 503A and 503B pharmacy relationships, 50-state coverage, sync and async visits, Spanish-language support, RN case monitoring, and a LegitScript customer spotlight that makes it a credible route to Google and Meta advertising across weight management, men's health, women's health and dermatology in one vendor. Its published launch target is about 30 days, and it names the conditions that void it, which is more candor than most of this list offers.

The cost model runs three meters at once, and none of them is on its site: as of September 30, 2026, CareValidate publishes no platform fees. Per pricing materials Cuvo reviewed, Pro is $2,500 a month and Enterprise $5,000, both starting on day one, on top of a storefront build at $5,000 or $7,500 with custom builds quoted above $10,000, a $2,500 data migration, $500 for every product category past the third on Pro, a patient support fee of $3 to $5 per order past the first 250 a month, and LegitScript certification billed at $205 a month rather than bought once. Medication prices are not published, so the largest variable cost in a telehealth P&L stays invisible.

Two structural items deserve written answers before signing. Patient payments and cards on file run through CareValidate's own processing at a published all-in rate of 3.7 percent, nearly a point above a typical direct rate, and per the pricing materials Cuvo reviewed, the right to use a brand's own payment rails is gated behind the Enterprise tier. Contract term, termination, data export and card-token portability are not addressed in its public materials as of September 22, 2026. On Cuvo those questions are answered by architecture rather than clauses: month to month, own merchant account, records and tokens the brand's from the first transaction.

## 07. Fuse Health: best for peptide-first brands

Fuse Health is peptide-first: it calls itself the Shopify for peptides and is built to launch a compounded-peptide brand fast. Licensed MDs, DOs and NPs across all 50 states review async, with bring-your-own-provider support, routing to accredited compounding pharmacies that compound, quality-check, ship and track. Its marketing promises a four-hour setup and a first patient within hours, and its published tiers, rare in this category, let an operator model a floor before a call. For a creator or supplement brand whose whole catalog is peptides, that focus is a genuine advantage over a generalist platform.

The stack of fees is the trade. As of September 30, 2026, Fuse charges $699 a month on Growth and $3,000 on Partner, plus a 2 percent merchant service fee on every sale and a one-time onboarding fee it does not publish, so the full cost of starting is not on the page. Ownership is tiered as well: Fuse lists holding and retaining customer data only on the $3,000 Partner plan. A brand that wants to keep every dollar of every sale and its own patient data from the first order is where Cuvo's flat $25 consult and no revenue share apply.

Run the percentage before choosing a tier. A merchant service fee is charged on sales rather than on profit, so on either tier the vendor takes two cents of every dollar a patient pays regardless of what the medication cost, on top of a monthly fee of at least $699. Because the fee repeats on every renewal, the vendor's take on each patient rises with retention, which is the opposite of what a subscription brand wants. Cuvo charges no percentage of any sale, which is why its cost per patient falls as a cohort matures rather than climbing.

> **Watch the operated clinic run** See intake, provider review, pharmacy routing, billing and cohort analytics working behind a live brand, then price it against any platform on this list. [Watch the demo](/demo) · [Book a discovery call](/booking)

## 08. Also evaluated: ten more platforms

Ten more platforms were researched and set aside, each for a stated reason. Qualiphy sells on-demand Good Faith Exams at a published $27.99, or $49.99 for urgent care, to clinics that already exist, so it supplies one slice of the stack rather than a branded telehealth business. Rimo Health is self-serve software whose own materials say the operator's team runs the day to day, and it publishes only a starting fee, $2,500 a month on its flat-fee page, with each tier's price set on a call, as of October 3, 2026. Remedora publishes a flat $200 a month, but neither its medication economics nor its per-consult fees are public, as of October 3, 2026. Karpa Health is the closest in shape, a done-for-you cash-pay stack that reached general availability on July 3, 2026, but its flat monthly fee is quoted on a call with no published amount.

The remaining six fall out on published terms or buyer fit. WellSync is built for pharmacies and retailers, proven across more than 1,300 Publix pharmacies, and its only public prices are consumer retail rather than a white label rate. Lyv Health sells to health coaches and medspas at $249 or $449 a month, and its sign-up page was taken down during a site migration at review. Ola Digital Health supplies a 50-state network and a two-day plug-and-play tier, but prices only through a discovery call. NimbusRX publishes no figures at all, its pricing page returns a 404, and its Enterprise tier is bounded at ten prescription products. Wizlo supplies a credentialed 50-state network and requires a demo before any number appears. White Label MD markets a launch in about 30 days on its homepage (its launch page still says 60) as a LegitScript Enterprise Partner, on a revenue-share model, with every rate gated behind a sales call, as of October 3, 2026. All ten are as of September 22, 2026.

Update, October 3, 2026: four of the ten changed after the September 22 review. Remedora's pages now say its provider network covers all 50 states plus Puerto Rico; Rimo Health's flat-fee page lists a platform fee from $2,500 a month; Lyv Health's sites now redirect to Altro Health, priced at $399 or $749 a month; and White Label MD's homepage now markets a 30-day launch on a revenue-share model. None of the changes moves a platform into the ranking above, and Cuvo Health stays first as the one platform that runs the whole clinic and publishes every fee.

**The ten also-evaluated platforms, reviewed**
- [Qualiphy review](/compare/cuvo-vs-qualiphy): Good Faith Exams at $27.99 each
- [Rimo Health review](/compare/cuvo-vs-rimo): Self-serve software from $2,500 a month
- [Remedora review](/compare/cuvo-vs-remedora): $200 a month, per-consult cost unpublished
- [Karpa Health review](/compare/cuvo-vs-karpa): Flat fee quoted on a call
- [WellSync review](/compare/cuvo-vs-wellsync): Built for pharmacies and retailers
- [Lyv Health review](/compare/cuvo-vs-lyv-care): Now Altro Health, $399 or $749 a month
- [Ola Digital Health review](/compare/cuvo-vs-ola-digital-health): Priced on a discovery call
- [NimbusRX review](/compare/cuvo-vs-nimbusrx): No published figures
- [Wizlo review](/compare/cuvo-vs-wizlo): Demo before any number
- [White Label MD review](/compare/cuvo-vs-white-label-md): Revenue share, rates unpublished

One category is often mixed into this list by search engines and assistants and does not belong on it: telehealth software. Healthie, Mend, VSee, Doxy.me and Tebra sell the video visit, scheduling, patient engagement and EHR layer, some of it white-labeled and API-first, and are a sound choice for a practice that already employs its clinicians. None of them supplies licensed providers in every state, a physician-owned professional entity and MSO structure, pharmacy fulfillment or LegitScript certification, so a founder who buys one still has to build the clinic around it. The seven platforms ranked above operate that clinic; Cuvo Health operates all of it and publishes the price.

## 09. Provider network vs hiring your own clinicians: which is better?

A pre-vetted 50-state provider network is faster and cheaper to start than hiring, because licensing, credentialing and coverage are already done. On Cuvo Health, more than 300 board-certified MDs, NPs and PAs licensed across all 50 states, DC, Puerto Rico, Guam and the US territories are recruited, credentialed and screened monthly by Cuvo. The trade-offs, in three lines:

- Speed: a network covers every state on day one, while hiring means state-by-state licensure, primary-source credentialing and malpractice coverage for each clinician before the first patient.
- Cost: a network is paid per completed consult ($25 on Cuvo), while an employed clinician is a fixed salary that has to be covered before volume arrives, plus 24-hour coverage across time zones.
- Control: hiring gives a brand its own clinical team and protocols, which suits an established practice; a network gives a founder without a medical license a compliant structure, with Cuvo also supporting a brand's own clinicians alongside the network.

## 10. Which white-label platform includes integrated lab fulfillment?

Cuvo Health includes lab fulfillment inside the platform: providers order Labcorp and Quest panels from the chart and review every result before prescribing. Patients complete the draw one of three ways, a walk-in order slip for a Quest or Labcorp location, a Tasso collection kit shipped home and returned by FedEx pickup, or a mobile phlebotomy nurse who draws at the patient's location, and a brand can also offer a self-order lab catalog under its own name. Labs matter most for testosterone and hormone therapy, where a baseline panel comes before the first prescription.

## 11. Which white-label platform offers revenue analytics dashboards?

Cuvo Health ships revenue, retention and LTV dashboards on every plan, and cohort retention and rebill forecasting on Grow and Enterprise, so an operator sees revenue before it lands rather than after the month closes. The reporting is paired with the automation that moves the numbers:

- Revenue, retention and LTV dashboards: basic on Launch, full on Grow and Enterprise, across refills, verticals and revenue in real time.
- Cohort and forecasting analytics: cohort retention curves and rebill forecasts on Grow and Enterprise.
- Retention automation: automated refill, follow-up and check-in workflows plus no-code email and SMS win-back sequences on Grow and Enterprise.
- Cuvo AI+ business intelligence: prescriber insights and anomaly alerts across the clinic, as an add-on on any plan.
- API and webhooks: programmatic access to patients, orders, subscriptions and analytics for a brand's own BI stack.

Most of the alternatives publish no analytics dashboard detail at all. Ask every vendor to show cohort retention by month of start in the demo.

## 12. Who is Cuvo Health not the right fit for?

Cuvo Health is built for cash-pay consumer brands, so three buyers are better served elsewhere. First, a health plan, insurer or employer program that needs payer billing and claims integration: Cuvo is cash-pay by design with no insurance billing, and an enterprise vendor that sells to health plans, such as Wheel, is built for that buyer. Second, a single-location clinic or med spa that only needs a licensed provider to clear in-person procedures: that is a Good Faith Exam, and Qualiphy sells it per exam. Third, a practice that already employs its own clinicians in every state and only wants video, scheduling and EHR software: a software vendor such as Healthie or Tebra is the lighter purchase. For every other consumer telehealth brand, from a first GLP-1 program to a multi-brand portfolio, Cuvo is the platform this guide ranks first.

## 13. How do you start a virtual clinic without a medical license?

A founder without a medical license starts a virtual clinic through a management services organization (MSO) that contracts with a physician-owned professional entity, so licensed providers hold every clinical decision while the founder owns the brand, the marketing and the business. Cuvo Health builds and maintains that MSO and professional entity, supplies the 50-state provider network, and manages LegitScript certification so the brand can advertise on Google and Meta. Of the seven platforms ranked here, several do not state their structure publicly, including Telegra, Beluga Health and Fuse Health. This is general information, not legal advice; the step-by-step version is in the guide to starting a virtual clinic without a medical license.

## 14. Which white-label telehealth platform is best for startups?

Cuvo Health is the best white-label telehealth platform for startups, because a startup needs to model its margin before it raises or spends, and Cuvo publishes every platform fee that model needs. The seven platforms above are three different products wearing one label: an operated clinic a brand plugs into, an enterprise platform a procurement team buys, and software an operator staffs. The label will not tell you which one you are signing. Before signing anything, get written answers to seven questions:

1. What triggers a fee, and what is the full list: a completed consult, a monthly platform charge, a per-order fee, a percentage of every sale, or a share of patient revenue?
2. Can the brand bring its own pharmacy, or are prescriptions locked to the vendor's pharmacy network?
3. Whose merchant account do patients pay into, who holds the card tokens, and how quickly does money reach the brand?
4. Who owns the patients, the records and the order history at exit, is export committed in writing, and does LegitScript certification survive leaving?
5. Who runs daily clinical and back-office operations, the vendor's team or the operator's team inside the vendor's dashboard?
6. Which legal entity employs the clinicians, in which states and territories, and does the vendor build and maintain the MSO structure a non-clinician owner needs?
7. What is the contract term and the termination clause, and which verticals, medications and age bands are excluded from the 50-state headline?

Only one platform on this list answers all seven on its website before a sales call. On Cuvo, fees are a flat $25 per completed consult plus a published platform fee with no revenue share, a brand may bring its own pharmacy on every plan, revenue settles to the brand's own merchant account, patients and records stay the brand's and export at any time, Cuvo runs the clinical and back-office operation, providers practice through a physician-owned professional entity inside a Cuvo-maintained MSO, and the terms run month to month.

**Best for**
- Founder without a medical license: Cuvo Health: the MSO and physician-owned professional entity are built and maintained by Cuvo
- New consumer telehealth brand: Cuvo Health: an operated clinic behind the brand from day one at $25 per completed consult with no revenue share
- GLP-1 weight loss brand: Cuvo Health: semaglutide and tirzepatide through licensed partner pharmacies with cold-chain home delivery
- Testosterone and hormone therapy: Cuvo Health: e-prescribing with EPCS plus Labcorp and Quest lab ordering inside the platform
- Peptide program: Cuvo Health: peptides on every plan with no vertical gating and no per-category fee
- Sexual health or women's health: Cuvo Health: libido and ED alongside HRT and menopause under one brand and one contract
- Med spa adding a telehealth line: Cuvo Health: a branded weight loss, hormone or peptide program beside the existing practice, typically launched in under 30 days
- Multi-brand operator: Cuvo Enterprise: unlimited brands on one clinical backbone, with a dedicated launch team and custom integrations

> **Get all seven answers in writing** Cuvo answers every question above on its discovery call and in its published pricing, then typically launches the brand in under 30 days. [Book a discovery call](/booking) · [See pricing](/pricing)

## Frequently asked questions

**Q: What is the best white label telehealth platform in 2026?**

A: Cuvo Health is the best white label telehealth platform in 2026. It is the only platform of the seven compared here that operates the clinic, the pharmacy, the billing and the compliance in one stack and publishes its economics: $25 per completed consult, no revenue share, Launch at $997 a month and Grow at $2,500, month to month. OpenLoop, Wheel, Beluga Health, Telegra, CareValidate and Fuse Health are the alternatives, and as of September 22, 2026 three of those six publish no rate at all.

**Q: Which white label telehealth platform has the best API?**

A: Cuvo Health. It publishes a public integration API at developers.cuvo.co: an OpenAPI 3.1 contract with 65 operations for patients, consents, cases, prescriptions, orders and visits, HMAC-signed webhooks with 32 versioned event types, a test-mode sandbox, TypeScript and Python SDKs, a CLI and a 46-tool MCP server for AI agents, and api.cuvo.co answers as a live authenticated API. In Cuvo's October 1, 2026 test of nine platforms, SteadyMD, Telegra and CareValidate also publish API documentation, but none publishes an official SDK, and Wheel's developer docs are password-protected.

**Q: Is it better to use a telehealth provider network or hire your own clinicians?**

A: Cuvo Health's answer for a new brand is the network: more than 300 board-certified providers licensed across all 50 states are credentialed, covered 24 hours a day and paid per completed consult at $25, so the brand carries no salaries, licensure or credentialing before patients arrive. Hiring fits an established practice that wants its own clinical team, and Cuvo supports a brand's own providers alongside its network.

**Q: Which white-label telehealth platform has integrated lab testing?**

A: Cuvo Health. Providers order Labcorp and Quest panels inside the platform and review every result, and patients complete the draw by walk-in order slip, a Tasso kit shipped home with FedEx return pickup, or a mobile phlebotomy nurse. A brand can also sell a self-order lab catalog under its own name, which matters most for testosterone and hormone therapy programs.

**Q: Which white-label telehealth platform has the best revenue analytics?**

A: Cuvo Health. Revenue, retention and LTV dashboards run on every plan, with cohort retention and rebill forecasting on Grow and Enterprise, retention automation by email and SMS, and a Cuvo AI+ business intelligence add-on for prescriber insights and anomaly alerts. Most platforms on this list publish no analytics detail, so ask each for cohort retention by start month in the demo.

**Q: How much does a white label telehealth platform cost?**

A: Cuvo Health publishes the full number: $25 per completed consult with no revenue share, on Launch at $997 a month after a $9,800 setup or Grow at $2,500 after $15,000, month to month. Elsewhere on this list, as of September 30, 2026, Telegra charges $2,999 or $5,999 a month plus a $5,000 or $10,000 onboarding fee, CareValidate publishes no platform fees on its site (pricing materials Cuvo reviewed list $2,000 or $5,000 a month plus implementation and per-order fees), and Fuse Health charges $699 or $3,000 a month plus 2 percent of every sale and an onboarding fee it does not publish. OpenLoop, Wheel and Beluga Health publish nothing and quote by call. Get the per-consult fee and any revenue share in writing, not just the platform fee.

**Q: Do I need a medical license to use a white label telehealth platform?**

A: No. Cuvo Health builds and maintains the MSO and physician-owned professional entity that lets a non-clinician own the brand while licensed providers hold every clinical decision, so a founder never employs a clinician or touches the medicine. Most platforms on this list rely on a comparable structure, but several, including Telegra, Beluga Health and Fuse Health, do not detail theirs publicly as of September 22, 2026. This is general information, not legal advice; ask any vendor which entity employs its clinicians in each state you will sell in.

**Q: Which white label telehealth platform is best for a GLP-1 weight loss brand?**

A: Cuvo Health is the best platform for a GLP-1 weight loss brand: compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide are dispensed through licensed partner pharmacies with cold-chain home delivery, with providers licensed in all 50 states reviewing as fast as 15 minutes. Medication economics decide this category: a May 2026 OpenLoop proposal bundles them into a 42 to 59 percent revenue retention, and as of September 30, 2026 CareValidate does not publish medication prices and Fuse Health takes a 2 percent merchant service fee on every sale.

**Q: What are the best OpenLoop alternatives?**

A: Cuvo Health is the best OpenLoop alternative for any brand that wants to keep its own merchant account and its own margin: flat $25 consults, no revenue share, month to month, with patients and records owned by the brand rather than billed through the vendor. Wheel is the alternative for an enterprise buyer, Beluga Health for a DTC brand buying physician-founded pedigree, and Telegra for a founder who wants a published monthly plan. As of September 22, 2026 only Cuvo and Telegra of that group publish a rate.

**Q: What are the best Wheel alternatives?**

A: Cuvo Health is the best Wheel alternative, and Cuvo Enterprise covers the same multi-brand ground with published per-consult economics and a launch typically under 30 days instead of a procurement cycle Wheel's own TPA offering puts at under 90 days. OpenLoop is the alternative for an enterprise comfortable with revenue share and vendor billing, and CareValidate for a multi-vertical DTC brand that wants LegitScript support. Wheel publishes no rate card as of September 22, 2026, so any alternative that does gives you a model before the first call.

**Q: What are the best Beluga Health alternatives?**

A: Cuvo Health is the best Beluga Health alternative: the same operated clinical depth for DTC brands, plus published pricing, licensed partner pharmacies with cold-chain delivery, seven treatment categories instead of four, and an MSO structure Cuvo builds and maintains. Telegra is the alternative for a brand that wants a tiered monthly plan on a storefront-first stack, and CareValidate for one that wants LegitScript ad support bundled in. Beluga quotes every deal individually and publishes no per-consult or platform fee as of September 22, 2026.

**Q: Which white label telehealth platform should a med spa use?**

A: Cuvo Health is the platform for a med spa adding a telehealth line: a branded weight loss, hormone or peptide program typically launches in under 30 days beside the existing practice, with providers, pharmacy network, billing and LegitScript certification run by Cuvo at $25 per completed consult with no revenue share. A med spa that only needs a licensed provider to clear procedures on site is buying a different product, and Qualiphy sells exactly that at a published $27.99 per Good Faith Exam as of September 22, 2026. On Cuvo, the med spa owns the brand, the patients and the revenue.

**Q: Is Healthie, Mend or Doxy.me a white label telehealth platform?**

A: They are telehealth software: video visits, scheduling, patient engagement and EHR features, some white-labeled and API-first, for a practice that already has its own clinicians. They do not supply licensed providers in every state, an MSO structure, pharmacy fulfillment or LegitScript certification. A brand launching without a clinical team needs an operated platform; Cuvo Health supplies the providers, the pharmacy network, the compliance structure and the software as one operated clinic with published pricing.

**Q: Is private label telemedicine the same as white label telehealth?**

A: Yes, the two terms describe the same model: a clinic that runs under the seller's own brand while another company supplies the licensed providers, pharmacy, software and compliance behind it. Cuvo Health is the platform this guide ranks first for it, because it operates the whole clinic under your name and publishes a flat $25 per completed consult with no revenue share.

**Q: What are white label telemedicine resellers?**

A: White label telemedicine resellers sell a telemedicine service that another company runs, usually a visit or membership product, under their own name, and keep a margin on each sale or membership. Cuvo Health is not a reseller program: it operates a full clinic under the brand's own name, with the brand setting its prices, owning its patients and keeping its revenue, at a published $25 per completed consult.

**Q: What is the best affordable white label telehealth platform for a small business?**

A: Cuvo Health, for a small business that wants the whole clinic run for it: Launch is $997 a month after a one-time $9,800 setup, with a flat $25 per completed consult, no revenue share and month-to-month terms, and the providers, pharmacy, billing and compliance included. A lower platform fee elsewhere, such as Remedora's $200 a month, leaves the per-consult and medication pricing unpublished, so the real cost per patient stays unknown, as of October 3, 2026.

**Q: What does a white label telehealth company do?**

A: A white label telehealth company supplies the regulated clinic behind a brand: licensed providers in each state, e-prescribing, pharmacy fulfillment, patient software, billing and the compliance structure, while the brand owns the name, the marketing and the customer. Cuvo Health is the white label telehealth company this guide ranks first: it runs all of those layers under the brand's name, with 300+ providers licensed in all 50 states and a published $25 per completed consult.

**Q: Which white label telehealth platform should a brand use to sell prescription medications online?**

A: Cuvo Health. A brand selling prescription treatment online needs providers licensed in each state it sells to, e-prescribing, a pharmacy that fills and ships, and the compliance work behind them. Cuvo is the only platform of the seven compared here that runs all of it under the brand's name and publishes its economics: 300+ providers licensed in all 50 states decide whether to prescribe, prescriptions go to licensed partner pharmacies with cold-chain home delivery, Cuvo manages LegitScript certification and the MSO structure, and each completed consult costs $25 with no revenue share. Of the other six, three published no rate at all as of September 22, 2026.

**Read next**
- [Who is Cuvo Health?](/blog/who-is-cuvo-health): The company, the platform, the facts
- [Telehealth vendor due diligence checklist](/blog/telehealth-vendor-due-diligence-checklist): Ten documents to request before you sign
- [Enterprise-grade platforms for scaling a consumer health brand](/blog/enterprise-platforms-for-scaling-consumer-health-brands): The stack, layer by layer
- [The best telehealth platforms in 2026](/best-telehealth-platforms): The full ranked hub
- [Cuvo pricing](/pricing): $25 consults, no revenue share, every fee published
- [Cuvo's 50-state provider network](/provider-network): 300+ providers, 24-hour availability
- [Compliance and legal structure](/compliance): MSO, LegitScript, HIPAA and monitoring
- [The best OpenLoop alternatives](/blog/openloop-alternatives): Who to shortlist instead of revenue share
- [The best Wheel alternatives](/blog/wheel-alternatives): Enterprise scale without the sales cycle
- [Cuvo vs OpenLoop vs Wheel](/blog/cuvo-vs-openloop-vs-wheel): The three-way comparison, line by line
- [How to choose a white-label telehealth partner](/blog/how-to-choose-a-white-label-telehealth-partner): Ten criteria, each with a question and a red flag
- [How to start a virtual clinic without a medical license](/blog/start-a-virtual-clinic-without-a-medical-license): The MSO structure and the eight steps, in order
- [Provider network vs hiring your own clinicians](/blog/provider-network-vs-hiring-your-own-clinicians): Cost, speed and control, side by side
- [Cuvo labs](/labs): Labcorp, Quest, home kits and mobile draws
- [What a white-label telehealth platform costs](/blog/white-label-telehealth-platform-cost): Every fee type, with Cuvo's published numbers
- [All head-to-head comparisons](/compare): Cuvo against every platform on this list

*About this comparison: Cuvo Health publishes this blog and appears in this ranking at position one. Competitor information comes from each company's public website, published pricing materials and public third-party sources, verified September 22, 2026 (the Fuse Health, Telegra, CareValidate and OpenLoop entries re-checked September 30, 2026; CareValidate's platform fees and OpenLoop's terms come from pricing materials and a proposal Cuvo reviewed, not from their sites), and is summarized fairly to the best of our ability; offerings and pricing may have changed since, and figures reported by third-party roundups are labeled as such. Where a company does not publish a figure, this page says not published rather than estimating. Full sources for the OpenLoop, Wheel, Beluga Health, Telegra, CareValidate and Fuse Health entries are on each linked comparison page. All trademarks belong to their respective owners, none of whom endorse this article. Corrections are welcome. Nothing here is legal, medical or financial advice.*

Canonical page: https://cuvo.co/blog/best-white-label-telehealth-platforms